Showing posts with label development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label development. Show all posts

Monday, July 22, 2013

World’s 100 richest earned enough in 2012 to end global poverty 4 times over



From the article by rt.com:

The world's 100 richest people earned a stunning total of $240 billion in 2012 – enough money to end extreme poverty worldwide four times over, Oxfam has revealed, adding that the global economic crisis is further enriching the super-rich.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Alternative Economics: The Other Canon

Three introductory video clips on "The Other Canon":

Introduction to the work of The Other Canon featuring a talk by Prof. Erik Reinert positing an historical alternative to neoclassical economics.

Part one:



Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Rijkste Europeaan, Bernard Arnault, wil niet langer Belg worden



De Fransman Bernard Arnault, topman van de Louis Vuitton-groep, heeft zijn aanvraag ingetrokken om Belg te worden. Over de naturalisatieaanvraag was er veel commotie in ons land en in Frankrijk.

Als reden om zijn aanvraag te laten vallen, zegt hij dat hij zich misbegrepen voelt door ons land. "Ik had de impact hiervan onderschat, al had ik gehoopt dat mijn aanvraag in alle discretie behandeld was. En mijn verlangen om dubbelzinnigheid weg te nemen, heeft niet tot succes geleid", zegt hij. (bron: deredactie.be)


Meer:

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Vranckx: Kinderarbeid op cacaoplantages in Ivoorkust (Canvas)



Zelfs 3 jaar na de beloftes van grote chocoladefabrikanten blijft kinderarbeid schering en inslag op cacaoplantages in Ivoorkust.

Dit is een reportage van de Deense journalist Miki Mistrati en werd uitgezonden in het Canvas-programma 'Vranckx: Chocolade, nog steeds bitter?' op 30 maart 2013.

Meer:

Thursday, November 15, 2012

How Arunachalam Muruganantham started a sanitary napkin revolution! (TED talk)


"If anyone runs after money, their life will not have any beauty. It is boredom. A lot of people making a lot of money, billion, billions of dollars accumulating. Why are they coming for, finally, for philanthropy? Why the need for accumulating money, then doing philanthropy?

What if one decided to start philanthropy from day one?"
From TED.



More:

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

“Underwrite the poor like we underwrote the banks”

“Underwrite the poor like we underwrote the banks” – UN experts propose Global Fund for Social Protection

[9 October 2012] GENEVA/NEW YORK – “Nearly 80 percent of the world’s poor do not have access to social protection to shield them from the effects of unemployment, illness, or disability – not to mention crop failure or soaring food costs. Yet, if we were to dedicate 2 percent of global GDP to securing this human right, basic social protection could be provided to all of the world’s poor,” stated Olivier De Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, and Magdalena Sepúlveda, the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

"Noorwegen stelt schulden van Derde Wereld in vraag" (DeWereldMorgen.be)

Heet van de naald, dus ik wil het jullie zeker niet onthouden: Daan Bauwens van DeWereldMorgen bericht dat Noorwegen als eerste land ter wereld schulden van de Derde Wereld in vraag stelt.
Noorwegen is het eerste land ter wereld dat als schuldeiser een onderzoek instelt naar de legitimiteit van schulden van ontwikkelingslanden aan de Noorse schatkist. Ook in Groot-Brittannië worden momenteel vraagtekens gesteld bij schuldenclaims aan ontwikkelingslanden.

De Noorse minister van ontwikkelingssamenwerking Heikki Holmås kondigde vorige woensdag een volledige doorlichting aan van de legitimiteit van alle schulden van ontwikkelingslanden aan de Noorse staat.
Link naar het artikel.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Stewart Brand: "Is Density Our Destiny?"

In last week's episode of the TED Radio Hour, the topic was The Future of Cities. In the first part of the radio hour, we come across the environmentalist Stewart Brand who I have discussed last year in my article on Ecopragmatism.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Bottom Billion: conclusions

Three central propositions that encapsulate how thinking needs to change:
  1. The development problem we now face is not that of the past forty years: it is not the five billion people of the developing world and the Millennium Development Goals that track their progress. It is a much more focused problem of around a billion people in countries that are stuck. This is the problem we are going to have to tackle, and if we stick with present efforts, it is likely to be intractable even as the dashboard indicators of world poverty get better and better.
  2. Within the societies of the bottom billion there is an intense struggle between brave people who are trying to achieve change and powerful groups who oppose them. The politics of the bottom billion is not the bland and sedate process of the rich democracies but rather a dangerous contest between moral extremes. The struggle for the future of the bottom billion is not a contest between an evil rich world and a noble poor world. It is within the societies of the bottom billion, and to date we have largely been bystanders.
  3. We do not need to be bystanders. Our support for change can be decisive. But we will need not just a more intelligent approach to aid but complementary actions using instruments that have not conventionally been part of the development armory: trade policies, security strategies, changes in our laws, and new international charters.
We need to narrow the target and broaden the instruments. 
-- "The Bottom Billion" by Paul Collier, p. 192

Collier on the role of economic growth

"Growth is not a cure-all, but the lack of growth is a kill-all."
-- "The Bottom Billion" by Paul Collier, p. 190

Agricultural paradoxes

Agriculture presents some unexpected paradoxes
  1. Shortage of food and famines mostly occur in countries that specialize in producing foodstuffs. The smaller the percentage of agriculture as a percentage of gross domestic product, the smaller the odds are of famine. In fact, the risk in countries with practically no agriculture is dying of eating too much.
  2. The most effective agriculture in the world, in the USA and Europe, is unable to survive without subsidies and protection.
  3. In 1970 Norman Borlaug received the Nobel Peace Prize for the 'green revolution in agriculture, for having produced new species that increased harvests and productivity immensely. This enormoous explosion of agricultural productivity has not drastically changed the number of poor and hungry in the world.
-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 149 - 150

Reinert's Critique on Modern Economics (2)

"The equality assumption [in international trade theory]: Assuming away all differences -between human beings, between economic activities, among nations - [...] all factors qualitatively differentiating a twelve-year-old and his shoeshine 'firm' based in a Lima slum from Microsoft as a firm have been eliminated. The two of them have been averaged out as 'the representative firm'."
"The core assumption of 'perfect information' in reality implies that humankind must consist of individuals that are all alike [...] ."
"The conclusion so proudly reached by standard international trade theory, that a world trade will provide 'factor-price equalization' is in fact already built into the basic assumptions of the theory itself; a theory in which all the elements are equal and identical cannot produce anything but equality of outcome."
-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 35 - 36

Aid as a pyramid game

Theory development led to what Schumpeter calls 'the pedestrian view that capital per se propels the capitalist engine'. The West started thinking that by sending capital to a poor country with no entrepreneurship, no governmental policy and no industrial system, they could produce capitalism. The consequence is that today we virtually stuff money down the throat of countries with no productive structure - where this money could be profitably invested - because they are not allowed to follow the industrial strategy all the presently rich countries followed. 
Developing countries are given loans they cannot profitably utilize, and the whole process of development financing becomes akin to that of chain letters and pyramid games. Sooner or later the system breaks down, and the ones who designed it, standing close enough to the door when everybody rushes out, are able to make good financial profits, while the poor countries themselves are the losers. This is part of the mechanism that often creates larger flows of funds from the poor to the rich countries than the other way around, one of Gunnar Myrdal's 'perverse backwashes' of poverty. 
-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 124


More:

Education, a key to development or to emigration?

Education is increasingly regarded as the key to expanding wealth in the Third World. In countries like Haiti, which specialize in non-mechanized production - in technological dead-ends - raising the level of education of the population will not help to increase the level of wealth in the population. In such countries the demand for educated personnel is minimal. Education is more likely to increase the propensity to emigrate. 
A strategy based on education succeeds only when combined with an industrial policy that also provides work for educated people, as happened in East Asia. 
-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 114


More:

Reinert's Critique on Modern Economics

Standard textbook economics is created as an abstraction from an economic scenario in the same way that the game of chess is created as an abstraction of a war scenario. But just as the war in Iraq is not solved by referring to the rules of chess, the problems of world poverty are not solved by referring to an economic theory that does not contain key variables from factual knowledge. 
-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 34

Sombart's driving forces of capitalism


Werner Sombart considers capitalism as a kind of historic coincidence, in which factors are brought together by a whole range of circumstances. Economic wealth is a result of its being willed, a result of a conscious policy. the driving forces of capitalism, which create both the foundation and the conditions for the system, are, according to Sombart:
  1. The entrepreneur, who represents what Nietzsche calls the 'capital of human wit and will', the human agent who takes the initiative to have something produced or traded.
  1. The modern state, which creates the institutions enabling improvements in production and distribution, and creates the incentives that make the vested interest of the entrepreneur coincide with the vested interests of society at large. Institutions encompass everything from legislation to infrastructure, patents to protect new ideas, schools, universities, and standardization of units of measurements, for example.
  1. The machine process, i.e. what was long called industrialism: mechanization of production creating higher productivity and technological change with innovations under economies of scale and synergies. This concept is very close to what we today call the 'national innovation system'.

-- "How Rich Countries Got Rich" by Erik S. Reinert p. 120 - 121

Nine strategies for landlocked countries

"Africa's landlocked countries are not oriented toward their neighbors. Both their infrastructure and their policies are oriented either to be completely inward-looking or toward the world market. Neighbors are just in the way of the world market, not themselves the market. And this shows up in the growth spillovers. 
In Africa, if the neighbors grow [...] it doesn't spill over. To date it has not mattered very much: usually in Africa the neighbors of the landlocked have barely been growing, so there has been precious little growth to spill over. But as things stand, even if the more fortunate countries started to grow, it would not help the landlocked." 

-- "The Bottom Billion' by Paul Collier, p. 57 - 58

So what can a landlocked country do?

Collier on "Reform"

"Reform in [failing states] has to come from within, and it takes courage. Vested interests can be relied upon to use their power, resources, and ingenuity to oppose change. Although the reformers have truth on their side, truth is just another special interest, and not a particularly powerful one. The villains willing to lie in order to defeat change have an advantage over those constrained by honesty. Reformers do not have it easy." 

-- "The Bottom Billion" by Paul Collier, p. 180

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...